Socio-ecological narratives of social work in a global context: an approach from the World Social Work Conference SWSD 2024
Keywords:
Social work, Environment, World Social Work Conference, Environmental crisis, Environmental justiceMain Article Content
This article analyzes and characterizes the papers on socio-ecological issues delivered at the Joint World Conference on Social Work (April 2024, Panama). The conference is a space of planetary encounter that allows to approach exchanges of knowledge, visibilization of problems and establishment of interesting emerging issues for a disciplinary exploration. Out of a total of 899 papers available, 68 were on socio-ecological themes which were analyzed according to prevailing topics, geographical origin of the papers and declared roles. We find disciplinary narratives centered on the environmental crisis, with particular emphasis on climate change, socio-natural disasters, community action, and the Sustainable Development Goals as the main guiding framework. We conclude that Social Work narratives possess ethical and contextual opportunities articulated in a great professional versatility. However, they also confront hegemonic narratives that hyper climatize the debate and align it with the dominant environmental agenda invisibilizing the violence and conflictive of extractives colonialism. In response, Social Work must strengthen its ethical-political positioning by drawing on its theoretical and methodological capacities to advance toward an ecocentrism turn.
Abdulai, A.-M. (2022). Could Eco-Feminists or Female Environmentalists Boost the Fight Against Climate Change? African Journal of Climate Change and Resource Sustainability, 1(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.37284/ajccrs.1.1.1039
Alston, M., & Bowles, W. (2018). Research for Social Workers: An Introduction to Methods. Routledge.
Boetto, H. (2017). A transformative eco-social model: Challenging modernist assumptions in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw149
Case, R. (2017). Eco-social work and community resilience: Insights from water activism in Canada. Journal of Social Work, 17(4), 391-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316644695
De Sousa-Santos, B. (2010). Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Ediciones Trilce. https://periferiaactiva.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/descolonizar-el-saber_final-de-souza-santos.pdf
De Sousa-Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South and the future. Sociologies in Dialogue, 1(1), 65–88.
Dominelli, L. (2012). Green Social Work: From Environmental Crises to Environmental Justice. Polity Press.
Dominelli, L. (2021). A green social work perspective on social work during the time of COVID-19. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12469
Estenssoro-Saavedra, F. (2021). Crisis Ambiental Global: ¿Una Crisis Antropogénica o Capitalogénica? Revista Divergencia, 10(16), 106-127. https://www.revistadivergencia.cl/articulos/crisis-ambiental-global-una-crisis-antropogenica-o-capitalogenica/
Flick, U. (2015). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa (5ª ed.). Ediciones Morata.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. (2023). The Impact of Disasters on Agriculture and Food Security 2023: Avoiding and reducing losses through investment in resilience. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7900en
Global Witness. (2024). Missing voices: the violent erasure of land and environmental defenders. https://globalwitness.org/es/campaigns/land-and-environmental-defenders/voces-silenciadas/#en-homenaje-a
Gray, M., Coates, J., & Hetherington, T. (2012). Environmental social work. Routledge.
Gudynas, E. (2015). Extractivismo: ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la naturaleza. CLAES; CEDIB. https://gudynas.com/wp-content/uploads/GudynasExtractivismosEcologiaPoliticaBo15Anuncio.pdf
Harvey, D. (2003). El “nuevo” imperialismo: acumulación por desposesión. Socialist Register, (2004), 100-121.
Hellweg, S., Benetto, E., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Verones, F., & Wood, R. (2023). Life-cycle assessment to guide solutions for the triple planetary crisis. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4, 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00449-2
Higuita-Álzate, K., y Eschenhagen-Durán, M. (2022). Abrir las ciencias sociales. Un reto para la educación ambiental superior. Gestión y Ambiente, 25(2), 105951. https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v25n2.105951
International Association of Schools of Social Work [IASSW], & International Federation of Social Workers [IFSW]. (2020). Global Standards for Social Work Education and Training. IFSW. https://www.ifsw.org/global-standards-for-social-work-education-and-training/
International Council on Social Welfare [ICSW]. (2025). Programa Global, descripción de la visión y los objetivos del ICSW en materia de desarrollo y bienestar social. https://www.icsw.org/publications/global-programme
International Federation of Social Workers [IFSW]. (2021). El Trabajo Social y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas. IFSW. https://www.ifsw.org/el-trabajo-social-y-los-objetivos-de-desarrollo-sostenible-ods-de-la-organizacion-de-las-naciones-unidas/
Iño-Daza, W. (2022). Saberes ancestrales, conocimientos locales y cambio climático en comunidades aymaras del Altiplano boliviano: apuntes del estado de arte. Millcayac, 9(17), 123-149. https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/millca-digital/article/view/5900
Leff, E. (2022). Racionalidad ambiental. La reapropiación social de la naturaleza. Siglo XXI Editores. https://ru.iis.sociales.unam.mx/bitstream/IIS/4937/1/Racionalidad_ambiental.pdf
Levis, C., Flores, B. M., Campos-Silva, J. V., Peroni, N., Staal, A., Padgurschi, M. C. G., Dorshow, W., Moraes, B., Schmidt, M., Kuikuro, T. W., Kuikuro, H., Wauja, K., Kuikuro, K., Kuikuro, A., Fausto, C., Franchetto, B., Watling, J., Lima, H., Heckenberger, M., & Clement, C. R. (2024). Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 8, 866–879. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02356-1
Liévano-Latorre, A. (2013). Escenarios y perspectivas de Trabajo Social en Ambiente. Revista Trabajo Social, (15), 219-233. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/tsocial/article/view/42586
Lowe, B.S. (2019). Ethics in the Anthropocene: Moral Responses to the Climate Crisis. J Agric Environ Ethics, 32, 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09786-z
Martínez-Alier, J. (2021). Mapping ecological distribution conflicts: The EJAtlas. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(4), 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.02.003
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. https://d-nb.info/1191589749/34
Moser, S. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say?. WIREs: Climate Change, 7(3), 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.403
Noble, C. (2016). Green Social Work – The Next Frontier For Action. Social Alternatives, 35(4), 14-18.
Papadopoulou, D. & Teloni, D-D. (2022) Climate Change, disasters and social work practice in Greece. Critical and Radical Social Work, 1-15.
Pérez-Soto, O., y Medina-Valdés, Z. (2023). ¿Neutralidad de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible? La crítica necesaria. Economía y Desarrollo, 167(2), 1-19. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0252-85842023000200001&lng=es&tlng=es
Quintana-Ramírez, A. P. (2021). La gestión colectiva del agua, una lectura desde el Trabajo Social. Revista Perspectivas, (39), 77-105. https://ediciones.ucsh.cl/index.php/Perspectivas/article/view/3014
Ramírez-Naranjo, N. (2020). Environmental Issues and Social Work Education, The British Journal of Social Work, 50(2), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz168
Ramsay, S., & Boddy, J. (2017). Environmental Social Work: A Concept Analysis, The British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw078
Reisch, M. (2001). Social Work Education and the Neo-Liberal Challenge: The US Response to Increasing Global Inequality. Social Work Education, 20(4), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2013.809200
Reisch, M. (2013). Social Work Education and the Neo-Liberal Challenge. Social Work Education, 32(6), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2013.809200
Reyes-Mason, L., Shires, M. K., Arwood, C., y Borst, A. (2017). Social work research and global environmental change. Journal of the Society for Social Work & Research, 8(4), 645-668. https://doi.org/10.1086/694789
Rubilar-Donoso, G. (2018). Trabajo Social y Derechos Humanos: perspectivas, posibilidades y desafíos a partir de la experiencia chilena. Trabajo Social Global – Global Social Work, 8(extra), 120-144. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v8i0.6494
Saavedra-Vásquez, J. (2023). Sobre la legitimidad de la intervención social. Reflexiones desde Chile. Prospectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social e intervención social, (36), e21012628. https://doi.org/10.25100/prts.v0i36.12628
Saito, K. (2017). La naturaleza contra el capital. El ecosocialismo de Karl Marx. Ediciones Belaterra.
Sánchez-Cota, A. (2013). Prácticas de resistencia y alternativas para el cambio. Una defensa del Trabajo Social con colectivos y comunidades. Trabajo Social Global. Revista de Investigaciones en Intervención Social, 3(4), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v3i4.953
Saravia-Cortés, F., y Panez-Pinto, A. (2022). Constelación espacial de conceptos para Trabajo Social: ambiente, lugar, territorio y paisaje. Trabajo Social, 24(2), 241-266. https://doi.org/10.15446/ts.v24n2.97954
Schipper, E., Dubash, N., & Mulugetta, Y. (2021). Climate change research and the search for solutions: rethinking interdisciplinarity. Climatic Change, 168(18), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03237-3
Sepúlveda-Hernández, E. (2018). Trabajo social en el campo socioambiental: discusiones, énfasis y desafíos a partir de la Conferencia Mundial de Trabajo Social 2018. Revista Perspectivas notas sobre intervención social, (32), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.29344/07171714.32.2032
Shah, S., Abbas, N., Serbanescu, L., Niu, R., & Abdelmohsen, A. (2025). The key challenges and best alternatives to environmental sustainability: a comprehensive study. Scientific Reports, 15, 7042. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90187-w
Soga, M., & Gaston, K.J. (2022). Towards a unified understanding of human–nature interactions. Nature Sustainability, 5, 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00818-z
Stamm, I., Ranta-Tyrkkö, S., Matthies, A., & Närhi, K. (2024). The ecosocial paradigm in social work: Striving for planetary well-being. Routledge.
Tocol-Alvarado, C., y Levicoy-Oyarzún, C. (2021). Trabajo social, identidades y roles profesionales en contextos de escolarización. Sophia Austral, 27, 17. https://doi.org/10.22352/SAUSTRAL202127018
Tomalka, J., Hunecke, C., Murken, L., Heckmann, T., Cronauer, C., Becker, R., Collignon, Q., Collins-Sowah, P., Crawford, M., Gloy, N., Hampf, A., Lotze-Campen, H., Malevolti, G., Maskell, G., Müller, C., Popp, A., Vodounhessi, M., Gornott, C., & Rockström, J. (2024). Stepping back from the precipice: Transforming land management to stay within planetary boundaries. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. https://doi.org/10.48485/pik.2024.018.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction [UNDRR] (2024). Forensic Insights for Future Resilience, Learning from Past Disasters. Geneva.
Vivero-Arriagada, L. (2017). Trabajo Social entre el sentido común, hegemonía y praxis: Un análisis basado en Gramsci. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 547-563. https://revistaumanizales.cinde.org.co/rlcsnj/index.php/Revista-Latinoamericana/article/view/2982/814
Wroe, L., Ng’andu, B., Doyle, M., & King, L. (2018). Positioning social workers without borders within green social work: Ethical considerations for social work as social justice work. In M. Gray, J. Coates & M. Yellow Bird (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of green social work (pp. 11). Routledge.
Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors assign the patrimonial rights to the journal and to Universidad del Valle on accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem pertinent for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles.
The journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) license.